Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 009
Original file (2014 009.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2014-009

 

TIS | 1 yr, 4 months, 27 days
Policy Implications _| None

 

 

 

The applicant was discharged for Separation For Miscellaneous/General Reasons due to a Voluntary Separation
request per ALCGENL 46/10. The nature of the request stemmed from pregnancy and fearing that she would
soon be a single parent without proper family support being assigned in a remote duty location. The command
endorsed her request and recommended an Honorable discharge. However, there are no administrative remarks
or correspondence discussing the Reenlistment code at the command or PSC-epm level. The applicant received
an RE-4 code that bars her from future reentry into military service.

The applicant was not advised or afforded an opportunity to dispute the reenlistment code of RE-4 issued to
her. Furthermore, the genesis of the separation was due to her proactive nature to ask for a Voluntary
Separation. Alas, this practical action somehow created an unfavorable outcome for future military service
which was not supported or explained. This voluntary separation mechanism offered via ALCGENL 46/10 was
not established to saddle ‘undesirable’ outgoing members with a banned from future military service
categorization.

In order to support an RE-4, the applicant should have been notified by the command in writing prior to the
separation. Or, a separation under different means should have been processed by the command. A
recommendation of an RE-3H is the appropriate reenlistment code to indicate that her request to voluntary
separate was due to family hardship. Additionally, the correct Separation Authority should be 12.B.12
(authorized by epm) from the Legacy Personnel Manual vice 12.B.16 which is for Unsuitability. All other
items, the Character of Service, Narrative Reason for Separation and Separation code should stand as issued.

  

An RE3 reentry code is not an affirmative recommendation for reenlistment, rather it represents that the
applicant is not recommended for reenlistment due to a disqualifying factor. The RE3 code may be waived
based upon the policies and needs of the gaining Service.

  
     
     
   
   
   
   

   

Propriety: Discharge was NOT proper.
Equity: Discharge was NOT equitable.

Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Partial relief is granted on the
applicant’s reentry code and will be properly aligned her Separation Authority as follows:

Re-entry code: RE-3H

Separation Authority: COMDTINST M1000.6A 12-B-12

All other items stand as issued.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 072

    Original file (2012 072.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This was the result of a voluntary SILO request made in 2009, by the applicant, due to an overwhelming financial situation in which relocation would have adversely affected their family. In the Fall of 2009, just 8 weeks prior to his request to SILO, the applicant was taken to Summary Court-Martial (SCM) for an inappropriate relationship onboard a USGC cutter. The board recommends that applicant’s SPD code be changed to KND with the narrative reason as: ‘Separation for...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 050

    Original file (2013 050.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-050 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6A, Article 12.B.16, JFX, Personality Disorder, RE4 RELIEF REQUESTED | Upgrade RE code RELIEF GRANTED SPD code: JND Narrative Reason: Separation for Miscellaneous/General Reasons BY DRB RE code: RE-3H Separation Authority: COMDTINST M1000.4, Article 1.B.12 (legacy Personnel Manual 12.B.12) ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 7 yrs, 6 months, 12 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 021

    Original file (2014 021.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was issued with an entry level separation due to the inability to adapt during the first 180 days of service. The 3L is defined as ‘Entry Level Separation, must have waiver to reenlist’. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 092

    Original file (2012 092.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with depressed mood by three separate physicians. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Board unanimously recommends that the applicant’s discharge stand as issued.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 042

    Original file (2012 042.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s parents were divorced and the mother relied heavily on the applicant to assist in the caring for her and other siblings. The Minority Board opinion on the applicant’s disqualifying mental health condition was not supported in the Narrative Reason for Separation. The Majority Board accepts the applicant’s assertions of being denied civilian employment based on the RE3 code.

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 082

    Original file (2012 082.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2012-082 Honorable, COMDTINST M1000.6, 12.B.16, JFX, Personality Disorder, RE4 Change Narrative Reason; Upgrade to RE code Upgrade to RE3; Amended to Adjustment Disorder and JFY SPD code ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 6 months, 13 days Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged in 2001 due to unsuitability based upon the diagnosis of an adjustment disorder. Therefore, the Board recommends that the applicant’s narrative reason...

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 079

    Original file (2013 079.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant claimed to be quickly separated from the forming company due to a medically disqualifying condition. Thereafter, the applicant claims to be mistakenly categorized as ‘Refusing to Train’. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 044

    Original file (2013 044.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Normally, when a member is separated with less than 180 days of service, they are issued an ‘Uncharacterized’ discharge. Based on the limited amount of supporting documentation, and the standard of reenlistment codes issued for Adjustment Disorder separations, the Board recommends an RE3 reentry code. Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: Partial relief on the SPD code, reenlistment code, and Narrative Reason for Separation as follows: SPD code: JFY RE code:...

  • CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 087

    Original file (2012 087.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2012-087 NAME CURRENT DD-214 Uncharacterized, , JGA, Entry Level Performance and Conduct, RE3L RELIEF REQUESTED | Honorable RELIEF GRANTED None BY DRB ADMIN None CORRECTIONS TIS 0 yrs, 0 months, 18 days Policy Implications _| None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged while at recruit training with an Entry Level Separation. With only 18 days of service and one medical evaluation at recruit training, there is not enough evidence to support a...

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 028

    Original file (2014 028.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was issued an entry level separation due to the inability to adapt during the first 180 days of service. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. An RE3 reentry code is not an affirmative recommendation for reenlistment, rather it represents that the applicant is not recommended for reenlistment due to a disqualifying factor.